stellarvue 82 degree eyepiece

Thanks! The rarity and significance of O-type stars brighter than 6.55 magnitude. They make a good addition to the Stellaruve brandedplanetary eyepieces he has already been selling. Please note: Internationally, grading systems used at institutions of higher educations may differ substantially. Kunming maybe? I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. Either model represents an excellent value in a mega-wide eyepiece. I did sell a lot of axiom LXs though, and owned the 23mm for a while and was impressed with it. I briefly experimented with a 100-degree eyepiece but it felt exactly like the 82-degree field, with the exception of shorter eye relief. I find I kind of have to make myself use them more often. This is a great moderate power wide field eyepiece for viewing all kinds of deep sky objects, the moon and planets. This particular line saw its sales creamed by the superior ES 82s when the price on the latter was reduced. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 20 percent. The result is the equivalent to your grade in the German grading system, where 1.0 is the maximum grade and 4.0 the minimum passing grade. With a 10 inch Newtonian at an f5 focal ratio, the 50mm eyepiece you are considering will produce a 10mm exit pupil. But viewing with glasses on is still possible. Honestly, I don't mind a 50-degree view, but 70 is definitely more immersive. Bottom Line: Another fine ultra-wide eyepiece for the money. They're still well regarded, though the 28mm is said to be ergonomically awkward to view through. Top-ranked German Universities in Munich. Because they're Stellarvue! Good heft without being too heavy. While the 76 Baader Morpheus provides slightly less field of view than the rest, the long eye relief and excellent image quality makes it new favorite of mine, and worthy of consideration. Field stops are different. TS have kept the old 4/7/16mm focal length specifications. Going Wide: Nine 82-Degree Eyepieces Compared, A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces, Price and Quality in a High-Power Zoom: SVBONY 3mm-8mm Zoom Review, Celestron Tabletop Tripod Review: Sometimes Smaller is Better. So that this makes sense - take your 30mm SuperView, focus on a nice cluster of stars (M45 akaPleiades is a great one). Eye relief is a comfortable 13mm and theres no annoying kidney-bean shadowing of the exit pupil, true of the others in this group. Eyepieces with 100 apparent fields of view provide the widest actual fields possible at any given focal length (with the exception of the few 110 and 120 models on offer). But I'm thinking a pair of the 16's might make a nice selection for binoviewers. I present them in order of increasing price. For starters, you can get by with your 9mm (unless you need to wear eyeglasses) and 30mm. Even if they arent perfectly sharp to the absolute edge Im sure theyll be fine for most of the usable viewing range which should be good. I still focused on the field stop and never got the spacewalk views others enjoy. No. Good decision! It can just matter on how you want to frame objects personally I feel 60o or less FOV is like looking through a tunnel so I dont use those EP's as much even though I have some. $65 a piece is very cheapfor these eyepieces, so you did a very good deal there. Pros: Great optics; wider field; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. Bottom Line: The standard of performance for 100 eyepieces. I've been looking at purchasing some additional eyepieces from those that came with my AD8 Apertura (9mm and 30mm). However, on a Schmidt-Cassegrain, with its more forgiving f/10 focal ratio, off-axis sharpness was much better. Stellarvue makes great scopes and youll love yours. For a differentiated assessment of the examination performances, the grades can be increased or decreased by 0.3 to intermediate values; the grades 0.7 and 5.3 are excluded. Another good example is the 50mm finderscope, from both WO and SV (I have both, mostly the same, both excellent). Bottom Line: A good ultra-wide eyepiece for the money. The only downside is that it's a bit bulky. Edit: For clarification, I am referring to the apparent field of view of eyepieces, not the true field of view. Edited by betacygni, 05 March 2023 - 10:45 AM. I was surprised! We are not all the same when it comes to eye relief requirements, especially when choosing an eyepiece that has more elements than the 5 element budget wide field types. The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view(click here for specifications), 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view (click here for specifications), 15.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view(click here for specifications). Of the lower-cost 82 models, this was a good choice overall for both optics and mechanics. ), Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, Read the review of the Stellarvue Optimus eyepieces by Tony Hallas in the May 2017 issue of Astronomy, Our EOP eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. Yes, for standard 1.25" and 2" eyepiece filters. However, eyepiece preferences are very personal and you will find a lot of different opinions on this series and its individual focal length. Though advertised as 80, I found the apparent field matched a Naglers 82 field. The Stellarvue 82 and Meades new PWA provide good performance for a much lower price. Get a chair! Don't dismiss buying a used EP out of the Classifieds section - I found two of mine there. In short, I found it uncomfortable to use. But the price is the highest. *Measured with eye cup rolled down. Having tried 52, 60, 70, 76 and 82, I'll stick between 70 and 82. Do you search for top universities and information on admission requirements, language certificates (TOEFL/IELTS) and application deadlines? The value for current overall gradeis the numerical value corresponding to your current overall letter grade. This is an enthusiast's forum - these folks typically take good care of their stuff. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. 2023 Astromart.com. The focal length choices seems a bit odd to me: 28mm, 16mm, 7mm and 4mm, but perhaps more focal lengths will fill in the gaps later. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. Has anyone out there tried both or have any thoughts? Cons: Soft off-axis star images. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 15 percent of the field and are still tight at the edge, though with some lateral chromatic aberration. There has always been a good OEM behind WO and SV, but the winner is the consumer, who quite frankly doesn't care because the consumer can't buy directly from the OEM. Be informed, it can't hurt you. Seeing the outer 10 degrees in direct vision is not so easily done. They are probably another variation of the UWANs, thought the specified focal lengths have been changed from 7mm to 8mm and from 16mm to 15mm. Eye relief is an excellent 17 mm, longer than in more premium models, and the eyecup is extendable. I need at least 22mm of effective eye relief. Your scope is a f5.9. Now I see all 3 at half price sale for under $300 for them and that's pretty good, imo! }. Introducing the Stellarvue Optimus eyepiece series. Light Benders: 2" Astro-Physics MaxBright, 2" iStar dielectric, 2" Stellarvue Deluxe, 2" TAL/ NPZ dielectric, 2" Baader Amici prism . I find the 82 degree fields of my Explore Scientific 9mm to be less accessible, though it is a nice sharp view. But it is an excellent eyepiece, for $80 less than the Tele Vue Ethos. At NEAF, I purchased the 16mm UWA from Stellarvue for $95.I've owned all the WO UWAN in the past but sold off all of them except the 4mm.There was nothing wrong with them. They are still the best but are expensive. The ES is solidly made and comfortable to use despite its short 11mm eye relief (measured from the top of the eyecup), due to the recessed eye lens (the specs state 15.6mm). Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. Here is a good listing of who actually makes applianceshttp://www.appliancehase/make.shtml. Guess I never answered the OP's real question here - favorite FOV, lol. Several functions may not work. Bottom Line: A superb and compact top-class eyepiece. Not quite so easy a question. Ive never been a fan of zoom eyepieces. My bad experience with the 14 Meade put a bad taste in my mouth so I stuck to the big series 4000 version, and never gave the 5000s and axiom LX much thought even when I had access to try them whenever I wanted . Stellarvue 8mm UWA Ultra Wide Angle 82 degree 1.25" Eyepiece - New. A great one-two punch when observing. Cons: Very aberrated off-axis star images; slightly less than 82 field. Its barrel fits only 2-inch focusers and so requires more costly 2-inch filters. I wouldn't expect additional focal lengths. He sells a 4.9mm and a 6.1mm, I also have his 2.9mm which seems to have been dropped from the lineup. Munich, German Mnchen, city, capital of Bavaria Land (state), southern Germany. 70 is fine at low power, 78-85 fine at medium power, but I prefer 110 at high power. Bottom Line: A good, economical choice for Schmidt-Cassegrains. EPs: ES 2 . (Cheaper products abound, but you never know what you'll get. But it is an excellent and attractive, though large, eyepiece at a slightly lower price than a Nagler with much better eye relief. But once i start using something around 1m+ in focal length, I find 70+ degrees is preferable, and if it matches nicely with the scope, the more apparent field the merrier. Bottom Line: A top-class eyepiece for optics and build quality. For me, anything 60 degrees or greater feels sufficiently wide. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. Also, I view with eyeglasses because of my severe astigmatism. It's all part of the marketing game. And stars are tack sharp across 95 percent of the field, flaring only slightly at the very edge. And it is just for 2-inch focusers and so requires 2-inch filters. Uhno. This is a recommended complete set of eyepieces for use with any Stellarvue telescope from the SV70T to the SV152 Flagship! However, stars began to bloat 60 percent out from the center and were quite distorted at the edge. But the twist-up mechanism in one unit I tested (which I exchanged) was loose and rattled. Like twins separated at birth, Meades MWA (Mega Wide Angle) looks nearly identical to the Omegon Panorama2. It is been known for a long time that the 7mm UWAN is closer to 8mm, so maybe the previously given field stop specifications have been misrepresented so that the focal length-FOV equation should add up on paper(?). They're just too big and heavy and more of a novelty view for me, whereas my 82's are quite comfortable. At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvues Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. We are fast approaching "galaxy" season, with the planets in the rear view mirror. Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, 3. As objects get smaller, and magnification gets higher, I think I appreciate a view that is tightened up a bit. Faster scopes (below f5.9) are more sensitive and require more expensive EP's and a probably a coma corrector. A year ago, they had 3 focal lengths of 82 eyepieces of 4, 7, and 16mm, and I reported them in the 2016 Guide to eyepieces. The true field of view is 0.75 degrees, with an exit pupil of about 1.9 mm. I haven't used it in the field and it's pretty heavy but it's my best shot and easy access. Probably not by much, if at all. You sometimes feel more like you are actually there, in the view. Anyway, my main concern was trying to get most or all of the Pleiades in my view. In the AD8 . All important info for international students in Germany (2023/2024), 0 (90 programs for EU citizens/Non-EU), 21,000 per semester (1 program for EU citizens/Non-EU), Program Fees: 0 - 10,000 (per semester), Program Fees: 0 - 9,750 (per semester), Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Hochschule der Bayerischen Wirtschaft (HDBW), Hochschule Fresenius - University of Applied Sciences. They look absolutely identical apart from a few superficial features (eyecup, 1.25" barrel and rubber grip band). Tele Vues Type 6 Naglers are small, light and tack sharp across the field, even on fast f-ratio telescopes. The 16mm is often considered the weakest of the line (though still a decent performer) and I've read a lot of good things about the 4mm. I figured out my preferred fov and eye relief by purchasing used eyepieces here on CN. The LHD series includes four other focal lengths, all with 20mm eye relief, and with the 4mm, 6mm and 9mm eyepieces having 1.25-inch barrels but very tall form factors. i think that what you are going to hear is : "what are you interested in looking at ?" I ordered mine from Omegon and overseas delivery was prompt. To be totally fair, not all eyeglass wearers are the same or require the same amount of eye relief. Mega gratz on your new scope NIckwin. When using hand driven alt-azimuth mounts this generous field will be appreciated. Cons: Slightly soft off-axis performance. It eliminates the need to rebalance the telescope. On my f/5 to f/6 test scopes, stars started to distort 50 percent out from the center and were quite bloated at the edge, the poorest optical performance of the group, but one thats commensurate with price. Some models sell for as much as $700 to $1,000 each. For 1.25" 82 eyepieces, I have a mixed set of Televue, ES, and UWA. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. But I still prefer the Ethos SX on Uranus and Neptune because it gives me a much longer time between nudges and that allows me to relax more when looking. The OEM can be contracted to make them to whatever specifications, exacting or not, that the "name on the product" requires. I find that the longer the focal length of the scope, the more I wanted wider apparent fields. Never occurred to me that they might actually be the same. Most suffer from variable plossl, svbony, SVBONY Zoom Eyepiece, Zoom eyepiece. The eyepieces rival Televue but they were sold to fund an Ethos. The 100 eyepiece tripod. I knew they were re-branded. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. I think you will find a wide range of preferences. In eyepieces, models with the extreme apparent field of 100 rank at the top for performance - but also price! ***Apparent Field of View measured in degrees. All rights reserved. A frequent example on here is the 84 degrees of the Docter 12.5, which is a highly accessible but wide field. All of this experimenting made me settle on 70 as a nice middle ground. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. sold for a while and that line was 16, 8, 4. The 102 degree Nikon HWs are another good example. Introducing the Stellarvue Optimus eyepiece series. Have fun experimenting! You currently have javascript disabled. Accessories, Astrophotography gear, Reviews. Cons: Short eye relief and non-adjustable eyecup. The Explore 100 comes a very close second to Tele Vue in sharpness, with stars sharp across 90 percent of the field and still well contained at the edge. The attractive price makes it easier to collect the complete set of three, along with the 8mm and 4mm models. How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. While low cost for a 100 eyepiece, consider import fees if ordering from Europe. The rubber eyecup can be raised higher with the use of an included extension ring; a twist-up mechanism would have been preferable. Both have the same true FOV and cover the cluster nicely. I tested it side by side with my 9 mm Nagler on my SV-105 and I could not see any difference. The 13mm Televue Ethos is $658, the Televue 13mm Nagler is $335. The A-T is darn close, but does give more magnification and FOV. Will 1.25 inch eyepieces fit ES coma corrector? The only cons I've noticed is that they are big and heavy and change the balance point for my small scope+cheap mount and like any other optical system they have to cool down to ambient temp to get the best view (which takes a few minutes). Bottom Line: A better bargain 82 eyepiece. As Jon said, it will take some time to build an eyepiece range. I think probably not. It performs well on faster telescopes, a key characteristic of Nagler and Ethos eyepieces. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. But it just matters on if you need the eye relief or not, the AT UWA 28 would be great as well if not wearing glasses. I was surprised! Cool, thanks for the info! Bottom Line: A well-made eyepiece but costly for the performance. I missed the 16mm and regretted it as it's a very useful focal length. Though more costly, the Stellarvue Optimus also stood out for price vs. performance in a full 100 eyepiece. You may see the shadow of the secondary mirror with this eyepiece and exit pupil. A+ is the highest possible grade, and the lowest grade to pass a course is D. So if you assign numerical values in ascending order starting with 1, the input for the grade conversion is as follows: In the conversion tool, you enter 1as maximum grade (corresponding to A+), and 5 asminimum passing grade (corresponding to D). If theres one premium eyepiece to buy, it will likely be in this focal length range. Oh, barlowed the 15mm starts to show curvature around the 80-85% mark for my eye and the 4 and the 8mm the same since already barlowed. The knurled grip rings and construction of both are superb. Super crisp images to the edges. I find there are very few choices when it comes choosing a high quality 70 to 82 AFOV design that have enough eye relief for me to see the entire FOV. While still impressive, they arent as wide as the others. I think they are made by the same company that made other brands, Orion, Zhumell, SmartAstronomy, et al. The eye has to be a little above the eyecup for best position, with eye relief just 12mm. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. Build quality 2nd to none.., relatively light for it's size.., but most of all the view is spectacular, all the way out to that wide 100 degree FOV. You would recognize the names of the OEMs if I told you. . I find the Televue better, but both the ES and UWA are very close. Edited by David E, 08 October 2014 - 08:14 PM. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. Very fast shipping and packaging. My conclusion upon testing this 100 group was that performance was more or less commensurate with price. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. Personally, I find the 70-72 degree range perfect for my needs and taste; and there are plenty of offerings in that range with adequate effective eye relief for eyeglass wearers. Edited by 25585, 06 March 2023 - 09:04 AM. That doesn't happen with 100 degree eyepieces. Cons: Field less than others; eyecup height not easily adjustable. I saw clear, sharp, spacious views of Jupiter and the Moon when I first tried this eyepiece, and it also works well on double stars. I had been planning on getting ES 82 degree EP's, but I just couldn't pass these up for the $. I started with the A-T and would still have it if my wife did not wear glasses (I'm guessing it's only a matter of time for me as well). It looks very similar to the Stellarvue 82. Read Alan Dyers comparison of nine 82-degree eyepieces, Tag List TELESCOPE meade eyepiece Explore Scientific tele vue omegon stellarvue. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". Vixens fine eyepieces dont get the respect they deserve. I tested nine brands of 82 eyepieces, all in the 13 mm to 16 mm range, a focal length that provides moderate power on most telescopes and so is suitable for all types of viewing. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. And the 31 was the same as the 30uwa/82, but obviously marketed as a 31 nagler alternative. A 100 degree field of view provides the user with almost 1.5 times the area of an 82 degree eyepiece. There are more expensive products, but do they perform any better? Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. display: none !important; 100 degree eyepieces are quite amazing but they are also very large and can be quite heavy. I would target a 12mm-13mm for my first EP purchase. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. They were identical to the UWANs (and 5 other brands of the same eyepieces). I've pretty much settled on 68-72 degree eyepieces. One thing I like about the type 6 Naglers for doubles is that they're parfocal. Explore Scientific 11 mm - 82 Argon Purged Waterproof 1.25" Eyepiece SKU: EXS-EPWP8211-01 Focal Length: 11 mm Apparent Field of View: 82 degrees Barrel Size: 1.25" Eye Relief: 15.6 mm Free shipping $229.99 In Stock Add to cart As low as $7.43/Month Apertura 9mm - 27mm Zoom Eyepiece SKU: APT-ZOOM927 Focal Length: 9mm - 27mm In my scopes, I generally use the 3.5 mm Nagler with the 2X TV Barlow as my highest magnification. Returned it. Thanks for any input if anyone is still watching here. The apparent field is indeed noticeably wider than the other 82s. When using hand driven alt-azimuth mounts this generous field will be appreciated. I tested several eyepieces advertised as having 100 fields, all with focal lengths from 13mm to 15mm, a good sweet spot for any eyepiece on most telescopes, and encompassing the focal length of the original 13mm Nagler and Ethos models from Tele Vue. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. Edited by jrbarnett, 08 October 2014 - 02:40 PM. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET. Pop. But then again, thats more or less the point the eyepiece gets out of the way so you no longer have the sense you are looking through a round porthole or window. We recommend this as the ideal deep sky eyepiece for viewing nebulae, clusters and galaxies. Good luck and clear skies! Then MyGermanUniversity is the right place for you. Are these made by United Optical? Eye relief is a very long 20mm. #wo_online_image, #wo_offline_image { Incredible clarity across the entire field of view. I can easily watch a close double drift past the field stop of a type 6 Nagler and often do. I am also intrigued by the 4mm. I tested this set on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. Other than that, this eyepiece is excellent and certainly merits your consideration. There are lots of OEM products floating around. Don't know if this means that that the actual focal lengths are different? Stars begin to distort in the outer 25 percent of the field, so worse than the Explore Scientific and Tele Vue Ethos, but still very good, especially for the price. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. And the color-coded cosmetics of the SSW series are attractive, though somewhat moot in the dark under red light. Field Stop: 13.6 mm Number of Lens Elements & Groups: 7 elements Special Features: Tapered insert tube Comes with Dust Caps? Bottom Line: The best for optics but others provide more comfortable viewing. While not as wide as the others, the Morpheus comes close, so I included it. They look as good to my eye as any of the other high-end eyepieces I've used. Below shows the 100 degree Ethos alongside the 82 degree Nagler. Thus my max AFOVs are; 2.5 is 45 degrees, 3.5 is 65, 4 is 45 degrees, 4.5 is 76 degrees, 5 and 5.2 are 65 degrees, 6.5 is 76 degrees, 7 and 8 are 65 degrees, 9 is 76 degrees, 10 is 70 degrees, 12 is 92 degrees, 13 is 65 degrees, 14 is 80 degrees, 15 is 62 degrees, 17 is 92 degrees, 18 is 62 degrees, 20 is 80 degrees, 22 is 82 degrees, 25 is 60 degrees, 26 is 62 degrees, 28 is 68 degrees, 30 is 80 degrees, 31 is 82 degrees, 34 is 68 degrees, 40 is 70 degrees, 55 is 50 degrees. Edited by Neanderthal, 05 March 2023 - 09:40 AM. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. Why 5 stars? This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. The new TS UWANs are waterproof and filled with nitrogen. Maybe the following might help: This shows the FoV for a 28mm 82 deg, a 25mm plossl, and a 7mm Xcel EP on my Orion XT8 ( 203mm/1200mm = f5.9), Jon, I 'll be needing some guidance soon; the 28/82 is on the way: using that and my 7mm Xcel as a base, I'll be upgrading/replacing the others to flesh out a "good" set. This my first refractor, my first telescope with quality optics, my first telescope with a wide field of view, and my first telescope with a decent focuser (among other firsts) so I am very excited and anxious to get my hands on it. Report back witn with your thoughts when you get a chance. The 8-element Morpheus design provides nearly top-class performance for much less than the premium competition, which would also include Tele Vues 72 Delos series. Collecting EP's is a journey for sure in finding out what you really like. In my 80/480 refractor, I find even 50 degrees for "high" power to be quite good--e.g., Nagler 3-6 zoom. The Meade and Omegon represent great values. The Omegons weight is 600 grams, at the lower end of the range for eyepieces in this group. I tested these on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. I doubt Vic Maris will reveal who his OEM is. Buy all three of our high end 82 degree eyepieces and save! Its long 20mm of eye relief, screw-up eyecup and large eye lens makes Orions Lanthanum a pleasure to use. Does anyone know anything about the new Stellarvue UWA's? Certainly a keeper. Eye relief is 15mm, a little longer than the Explore and Stellarvue competitors. The 28mm UWAN does not appear to be available any longer, but here is an old CN article about the line. An important factor is whether you have astigmatism in your observing eye and need to wear glasses when observing,. The most eyepieces I use are 65 to 70 degrees. I think these are the same that WO(?) I really like the 82 FoV in my scope, great image, easy to manage and store. Bottom Line: Economical but with optical flaws. Bottom Line: Near-Ethos image quality for less money. Observing while seated is a much better experience. With some help from the members here, I'm awaiting a 28mm 82 degree Stellarview EP. I once read that Televue actually bench tests all of their eyepieces before delivery to their customers or dealers; if so they may be unique in this regard. I have a 4.5mm Morpheus and a 4.7mm Ethos SX. Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights. HOW did the Stellarvue EPs work out???? Stellarvue 8mm UWA 82 degree eyepice that has never been used. The focal length choices seems a bit odd to me: 28mm, 16mm, 7mm and 4mm, but perhaps more focal lengths will fill in the gaps later. Anything is possible. The result given here is non-binding, as this grade converter can only provide a general first estimation. My conclusion from testing this 82 group was that the Explore Scientific came very close to matching the standard-setting premium Tele Vue Nagler, but at a lower price. Click here to simulate the field of view, 3.

Tommy Lascelles Funeral, Hudson Grille Owner Dies, Serta Electric Blanket Troubleshooting, How Many Molecules In C6h12o6, Articles S